Open Notice of Pending Legal Action against Tonkon Torp LLP
Notice to Tonkon Torp LLP Insurance Providers, Tonkon Torp LLP Auditors, Managing Partners, Associates and all who have a financial interest connected to Tonkon Torp LLP
Tonkon Torp LLP has recently had serious legal action filed against Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Individual Tonkon Torp Attorneys.
Tonkon Torp LLP has been sued by an Investigative Blogger whom claims that several Tonkon Torp Attorneys were involved in Conspiracy to defame, taunt, harass, threaten, intimidate, and financial ruin her.
Tonkon Torp LLP, David S. Aman, Steven Wilker, and Mike Morgan of Tonkon Torp Law Firm have been named in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL as Counter Defendants.
According to Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP, has no way viable defense for defamation as he, allegedly, knowingly, told the New York Times, Forbes, Seattle Weekly and more that Crystal Cox had Extorted him and his client and that she was guilty of Extortion, knowing full well that was untrue.
Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox was not on trial for a Extortion. Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox was a Pro Se defendant in Civil Trial where David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP represented the Plaintiff, Obsidian Finance Group and he knew full well that the trial was not about Extortion. Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox had not been charged with, nor under investigation for the Crime of Extortion. Yet, with actual malice, David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP, knowing that Crystal Cox was not guilty of Extortion, told a Federal Judge that she was guilty of Extortion and told several major media outlets.
According to Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox this has led to her financial ruin, her business being lost, her life under constant attack and duress and has caused massive, irreparable damage to Crystal Cox.
David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP, allegedly did all this with actual malice, and actual knowledge of the facts in order to retaliate against a defendant he had sued prior and had already won $2.5 Million Dollar Judgment for his client.
David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP acted deliberately, maliciously, simply to TEACH a Pro Se Defendant a lesson, even though she already had a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgment against her.
David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP sent these media outlets a part of an email, one email out of 5 emails that a Pro Se Defendant in one of his cases had sent to him, in response to a cease and desist he had sent to her and after David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP had filed a lawsuit against her. She was corresponding with David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP in her Pro Se Capacity, acting as her own attorney, trying to negotiate a way to STOP a 10 million dollar legal action he had threatened and then filed against her, Crystal Cox.
David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP Attorney made it look as if this Pro Se Defendant was a Criminal, though she had not been charged with a crime.
This has led to well over a year of attacks, further defamation, threats, constant taunting and massive daily duress to Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox. And all this AFTER he had already WON his case against a Pro Se Litigant, simply to retaliate and harass her.
David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP Attorney also used the Obsidian V. Cox Docket as a way to attack Inventor Eliot Bernstein, who is one of the Inventors of the iViewit Video Technology, in which Tonkon Torp LLP client Intel has knowingly infringed on for over a decade.
Tonkon Torp Law Firm also represents Enron in their Bankruptcy Issues. Enron, according to massive documents of proof in the iViewit SEC Complaint, iViewit RICO Complaint and Legal Action and massive iViewit related legal documents, went bankruptcy over deals between Proskauer Rose Patent Lawyers and Enron that were all about the pending iViewit Technology Patent, in which the iViewit Technology company never did get credit for.
Tonkon Torp Law Firm knows that their association with Enron and Intel creates massive liability over David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP adding iViewit Technology Founder Eliot Bernstein as a named Defendant to Obsidian V. Cox.
The Obsidian V. Cox Trial was 11-29-2011, the Verdict was issued that same day. This means the Case was done, the Trial had taken place and the ONLY, named Defendant was Blogger Crystal Cox. Court Dockets easily prove all these details.
Yet on 5-11-2012, nearly 6 months later, David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP Attorney, simply added iViewit Technology Founder Eliot Bernstein as a named Defendant to Obsidian V. Cox, a court case that was over 6 months prior. How is this possible? How do Tonkon Torp Attorneys have this kind of power, to add a named Defendant who was never served and never part of a legal case, to a Court Docket as a named Defendant, 6 months after the Trial took place?
David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP Attorney allegedly added iViewit Technology Founder Eliot Bernstein to the court docket simply to threaten and harass him, in order to attempt to protect iViewit Technology Tonkon Torp LLP's liability or the liability of their clients Enron and Intel.
Crystal Cox is Suing Tonkon Torp LLP and Tonkon Torp Attorneys for 10 Million Dollars Each. The iViewit Technology is said to worth over 13 Trillion Dollars, Intel is still infringing on the iViewit Video Technology, and Intel has not disclosed this known liability to their shareholders.
It seems that if there is ANY litigation pending that Tonkon Torp LLP, under FASB, and other rules and regulations, MUST notify their insurance providers and their auditors. Tonkon Torp LLP has report this massive liability.
Tonkon Torp LLP, as representation for Intel, also seems to have a duty, an obligation to Notify Intel Shareholders of the massive liability that they have not been notified of, over the patent infringement of the iViewit Technology. If Tonkon Torp LLP DOES NOT ethically notify Intel, INTC, Shareholders, then Intel may very well be another ENRON, as the iViewit Technology is said to be worth 13 Trillion Dollars and the liability to Intel, INTC, will most likely be in the 100's of Billions.
Tonkon Torp LLP must disclose pending legal action to Insurance Provides and Auditors, it is the Law. This is an open Notice regarding pending legal action against Tonkon Torp LLP brought on by Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox.
Here is the Complaint against Tonkon Torp LLP
in connection with Alleged Co-Conspirators
(Counter) Complaint Filed by Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142885647/Pro-Se-Counter-Plaintiff-Crystal-L-Cox-Files-Amended-Counterclaim
Counter Plaintiff' Motion for Summary Judgement
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/145538063/Counter-Plaintiff-Motion-for-Summary-Judgement-in-Nevada-Free-Speech-Threat-Nevada-SLAPP-Lawsuit-Nevada-First-Amendment-Threat-Lawsuit-District-of-Nevada-Case-212-cv-02040-GMN-PAL
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/145538063/Counter-Plaintiff-Motion-for-Summary-Judgement-in-Nevada-Free-Speech-Threat-Nevada-SLAPP-Lawsuit-Nevada-First-Amendment-Threat-Lawsuit-District-of-Nevada-Case-212-cv-02040-GMN-PAL
Memorandum to Counter Plaintiff' Motion for Summary Judgement
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/145538158/Memorandum-to-Counter-Plaintiff-Motion-for-Summary-Judgement
Posted here Upon the Knowledge and Belief of
Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox
Investigative Blogger
No comments:
Post a Comment