Showing posts with label Nokia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nokia. Show all posts

Monday, November 29, 2010

a Patent Thieving Showdown, Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel KNOWS how to WIN This One.

Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel knowing committed Fraud while the General Counsel at Intel Corp. - Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel knowingly helped Intel Corp. to Steal the Iviewit Technologies Invention (Patent Pending) and then Bruce Sewell Intel General Counsel moves oddly QUICK to be Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel.

What Does Steve Dowling, Head Apple PR Guy have to Say about this PR Nightmare should APPLE choose to tell the Truth about their Corrupt General Counsel Bruce Sewell, formerly the Corruption General Counsel of Intel Corp. - when Intel Corp. Illegally Used the Iviewit Technologies Invention?

I mean Steve Dowling - PR Genius at APPLE surely knows that Bruce Sewell, their big wig attorney .. oddly enough defending APPLE in another Patent Infringement, Patent Theft - Guess Ol Bruce Sewell is pulling some strings on this one and Nokia doesn't stand a chance.. I mean Intel Corp. WILL back up the Corruption Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel - or else Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel will Expose the Billions on Top of Billions of Shareholder Fraud that Intel Corp. Forgot to Disclose to their shareholder with a serious Fraud on the Iviewit Inventors.

I mean there is over 1200 documents of Proof at www.Iviewit.TV , and Documents at www.CEOpaulOtellini.com - Bruce Sewell is a Criminal and NOW a Top Attorney defending one of the Biggest Tech Companies in the World, What a Crock.

Here is todays News on the Corrupt Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell

"Apple Lawyers Up for Patent Showdowns With Nokia

Steve Jobs made Apple Inc.’s iPhone one of the best-selling smartphones on the market with its touch screen, fast Web connection and access to more than 300,000 downloadable applications. Now he’s adding lawyers to the mix.

Apple is squaring off this week against Nokia Oyj, the world’s largest mobile-phone maker, before the International Trade Commission. The dispute, in which each side alleges intellectual property violations, is also a precursor to Apple patent battles with Motorola Inc. and HTC Corp.

At stake is leadership in the U.S. smartphone market. Cupertino, California-based Apple is trying to protect its right to import the iPhone, while shutting out rivals, particularly those with devices powered by Google Inc.’s Android operating system, the world’s most popular smartphone software. Android- based phones also are made abroad.

“These are very well-known, deep-pocketed, high-end manufacturers,” said Lyle Vander Schaaf, an attorney at Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione in Washington, who handles cases before the commission. “Usually you have one 800-pound gorilla going after a new entrant. Here you’ve got 800-pound gorillas fighting each other.”

Apple has been the most-sued technology company since 2008, the year after the iPhone was introduced, topping Microsoft Corp., Hewlett-Packard Co. and Dell Inc., according to LegalMetric Inc., a compiler of litigation data based in St. Louis.

Fire With Fire

Jobs, Apple’s chief executive officer, is firing back by recruiting lawyers who have fought for and against some of the world’s largest companies, including Microsoft, Intel Corp. and Broadcom Corp. Broadcom won a patent dispute with Qualcomm Inc. last year that ended with Qualcomm paying $891 million in cash over four years.

Nokia, based in Espoo, Finland, took the first shot in the case before the ITC this week. The company sued in October 2009, claiming Apple infringed Nokia patents, and filed the trade complaint in December.

“Apple was a decade late to market for mobile phones,” Patrick Flinn, a lawyer at Alston & Bird who represents Nokia, said in opening arguments today in Washington. “You can undercut competition when you use the inventions of others.”

Apple contends Nokia’s real motive is to force it to surrender access to proprietary technology that differentiates the iPhone from competitors, a charge Nokia denies.

“Apple’s explosive success, especially in the smartphone market, came at Nokia’s expense,”William Lee, a lawyer at WilmerHale who represents Apple, said at the hearing. “Having failed in head-to-head competition, Nokia turned to litigation.”

Staff Recommendation

The ITC staff, which acts as a third party in the public interest, has recommended that the judge find that Apple didn’t violate Nokia’s patent rights, said staff lawyer Rett Snotherly.

Apple has made its own patent-infringement claims that could result in Nokia phones, including those powered by its Symbian operating system, being blocked from the U.S. market. Apple’s claims against Nokia were heard by an ITC judge early this month. The staff also recommended that no violation be found in that case.

“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” Bruce Sewell, Apple’s general counsel, said in a Dec. 11 statement on the Nokia case.

‘Clash of the Titans’

Sewell, who joined the company last year after almost 15 years at Intel, is leading Apple’s legal efforts. During his time at Intel, including as general counsel, the company was known to use lawsuits to bottle up rivals in costly legal disputes, said Rob Enderle, president of Enderle Group, a technology consulting firm in San Jose, California.

Before working at Intel, Sewell was a partner at Phoenix- based law firm Brown & Bain, which represented Apple in its copyright case against Microsoft.

While many of the technological features behind smartphones have been around for years, their surging popularity has led large companies to go after one another rather than upstarts, saidSteve Perlman, CEO of online game company OnLive in Palo Alto, California. He holds more than 100 patents.

“Patents are a form of market power,” said Perlman, a former scientist at Apple. “We’re seeing a clash of the titans.”

The International Trade Commission, a quasi-judicial agency, was set up to protect domestic markets from unfair trade practices. It has the power to ban imports of products found to infringe U.S. patents.

‘Stop Android’

“It’s really high stakes,” said Vander Schaaf. “It’s a ‘who’s going to blink first’ issue.”

Apple may have even more riding on ITC cases against HTC and Motorola, which use Android. Devices running Google’s software accounted for almost 26 percent of worldwide smartphone sales in the third quarter, compared with almost 17 percent for the iPhone, according to Gartner Inc.

“The effort here is to stop Android” through the trade commission, Enderle said.

In March, Apple filed an ITC complaint against Taiwan-based HTC, the world’s biggest maker of handsets using Google and Microsoft operating systems. Apple alleged HTC infringed several patents, including ones related to mobile phones. A trial, which will include additional claims against Nokia, is scheduled to begin in February.

Linda Mills, a spokeswoman for HTC, which has filed counter-complaints against Apple, declined to comment. Motorola spokeswoman Jennifer Erickson declined to comment.

IPhone Versus Droid

A unit of Schaumburg, Illinois-based Motorola filed an ITC complaint against Apple in October, alleging it infringed 18 patents. In response, Apple filed a case claiming the Droid and other Motorola smartphones are using Apple intellectual property without permission.

Apple has hired some of the nation’s top patent lawyers as outside counsel. They include Lee of WilmerHale in Boston, who successfully represented Broadcom in its fight against Qualcomm;Robert Krupka of Kirkland & Ellis, who negotiated a 2005 settlement in which Apple agreed to pay $100 million to Creative Technology Ltd., maker of the Zen music player; and Matt Powersof Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, who successfully defended the patent on Merck & Co.’s biggest product, the $4.7 billion-a-year asthma drug Singulair.

This year, Apple added an in-house attorney, Noreen Krall, to focus on intellectual property litigation. Krall had been chief IP counsel for Sun Microsystems Inc. and a staff attorney atInternational Business Machines Corp., according to the Intellectual Property Owners Association.

The most likely outcome is that the companies agree to end the litigation by licensing each other’s patents, said Enderle.

Until then, “it’s going to get a lot worse before it gets better,” he said. "

Source of Post

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-29/apple-beefs-up-legal-team-for-patent-showdowns-with-nokia-motorola-htc.html

Oh and Isn't Time Warner Inc. in Bed with Apple with Movies on iPhones.. which uses the STOLEN iViewit Technology to Broadcast Movies On iPhone over the Verizon Network? Oh what a tangled web of fraud and deceit we weave.

hang in there Bruce Sewell - Soon You will all be Indicted, you will be coming clean to the Shareholders.. they will demand it and the Corrupt New York Courts Protecting You are About to Fall.. Click Here For Complaint against Andrew Cuomo NYAG, Intel Corp., SONY, Lockheed Martin, Warner Bros. , Time and Warner and more by Eliot Bernstein iViewit Founder and one of the Iviewit Technologies Inventors.

This SEC Complaint, Anti-Trust Violations, FBI Complaint, and Federal RICO Lawsuit involves.. names Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel and there is massive Proof that Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel is without a doubt guilty and now here is Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel Defending APPLE for Patent Theft.. How ironic indeed..

Got a Tip on any of This
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com


Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Daniel Cooperman Was Bought Out Because APPLE needed D. Bruce Sewell to fight NOKIA

What ever it Cost to buy out Daniel Cooperman you can be sure it was Worth It.

Obviously this is speculation on my part, however, Come on, What else Could it be

Mark My Words it was Not without a HUGE back Story on Why Bruce Sewell Left Intel Corp, What Motivated his Leave, Who had to Sign off on him Leaving, Who had to pay of Daniel Cooperman To Give his Job to D. Bruce Sewell and Just What Bruce Sewell Was bringing to APPLE that they wanted so Bad.

D. Bruce Sewell Knows his Way AROUND Anti-Trust Laws - Durward Bruce Sewell Certainly knows how to shut up those Pesky Inventors and Keep them from having ANY rights or Revenue from What they invented, and who knows what other "Connections" - "Cover Ups" and "Perks" D. Bruce Sewell brings to APPLE.

Maybe it is FCC, SEC, or FTC Connections that D. Bruce Sewell Brings to the APPLE Table, Whatever it Is, I Hope it Was REALLY worth it to APPLE and their Reputation.


$$$$$$

" Intel's Sewell Replaces Cooperman as Apple GC
Zusha Elinson
The Recorder
September 16, 2009

Steve Jobs has shown great staying power.

The general counsel who have served him lately have not.

On Tuesday, Apple Inc. said that its top lawyer, Daniel Cooperman, is retiring after two years on the job. At the same time, the company announced that it's hired D. Bruce Sewell, who stepped down as Intel Corp. GC on Monday.

"We are thrilled to have Bruce join our executive team, and wish Dan a very happy retirement," said Jobs in a press release.

"With Bruce's extensive experience in litigation, securities and intellectual property, we expect this to be a seamless transition."

The timing of Cooperman's retirement, at the end of this month, is unusual. He is 58 and he is potentially leaving about $17.5 million worth of unvested restricted Apple stock on the table.

Cooperman was granted 133,000 shares of Apple restricted stock on Nov. 1, 2007, after he was personally recruited by Jobs to replace the short-tenured Donald Rosenberg as GC.

Cooperman's stock grant was scheduled to vest over four years and he got the first quarter last fall, worth about $5.8 million at the current $175-a-share value.

The next quarter of the grant was scheduled to
vest on Nov. 1, six weeks from now.

Last year, the company gave Cooperman 60,000 shares that would vest in 2012.

Neither Apple nor Cooperman would say if the company had agreed to give him the stock early.
In an e-mail, Cooperman said he is looking forward to his free time after spending 11 years as the GC of Oracle Corp. and two at Apple.

"It is not often that we get to pursue our dreams," Daniel Cooperman wrote. "After 13 consecutive years in the GC role at two major Valley companies, with virtually no time to myself, I am looking forward to pursuing some other interests: community service, board and advisory roles, consulting, teaching, maybe even taking up golf. But it will be at my own pace, and on my own time."

Cooperman's predecessor, Rosenberg, lasted just 10 months on the job.

An East Coast lawyer from IBM Corp., Rosenberg had been brought on to shine up Apple's image after a stock option backdating scandal landed then-general counsel Nancy Heinen in hot water with the government.

Heinen was charged by the SEC and ultimately settled for $2.2 million. She had lasted nearly 10 years as GC under Jobs.

When Daniel Cooperman was hired, he was seen as a Valley guy who could handle Jobs' strong-willed personality, since he'd previously worked under Oracle CEO Larry Ellison. And most thought he'd be a better fit than Rosenberg, a Silicon Valley outsider.

During his tenure, Daniel Cooperman shaped up Apple's legal department. He hired Charles Charnas from Hewlett-Packard Co. to head up the corporate department, a position that had not been filled for years. He also instituted a preferred provider program where the company whittled down the number of outside law firms it uses.

"I leave Apple with great pride in the talented men and women who staff the Apple Legal Department," Daniel Cooperman wrote. "They have been marvelous colleagues. And, of course, I wish Bruce Sewell the best of luck in his new role."

D. Bruce Sewell will have his hands full.

The company is currently under scrutiny for its public disclosures of Jobs' ailing health.

The company initially downplayed the CEO's health problems last winter, but soon after announced that Jobs would take a six-month leave of absence.

Jobs received a liver transplant. Because investors believe that Jobs is so important to the success of the company, the SEC has reportedly opened an informal investigation into the adequacy of Apple's disclosures.

Apple is also facing an FCC inquiry into why the company rejected a Google software application for the iPhone that allows users to make cheap calls over the Internet. The company also has the usual mix of litigation facing tech companies, like patent infringement and product liability lawsuits.

D. Bruce Sewell, 50, was general counsel at Intel for the past five years.

A litigator by trade, he joined Intel in 1995. He's an old hand with antitrust issues, as one of his primary tasks at the chip company was to fight accusations brought by competitor Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

The European Commission fined Intel a record $1.45 billion for unfairly squashing competition earlier this year.

Intel announced that Sewell was leaving Monday amid a management shakeup. Tuesday's announcement that he would be taking Apple's top spot and Cooperman would be retiring caught the San Francisco Bay Area legal community off guard.

"This is a surprise and we are not going to know the truth of this for a while," said Martha Africa, an in-house recruiter with Major, Lindsey & Africa who was not involved in the deal. "One can speculate why this musical chairs is going on. But what is clear again is that the Valley is again valuing Valley insiders."

Apple did not respond to questions sent via e-mail and Daniel Cooperman didn't respond to questions about the circumstances surrounding his decision to leave.

Links to Read Full Article Above and for More on This...
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202433833262
Daniel Cooperman, Bruce Sewell
So Google was going to Work With APPLE on the iPhone and Now Google has it's own Phone... hmmmm... Not Fair Play over there at Apple no Wonder they needed Bruce Sewell.

Saturday, January 2, 2010

D. Bruce Sewell Ignoring the Iviewit Information, Not Telling Shareholders and Not Responsiblity Reacting Hurt Intel.

"Corporate Social Responsibility" - Not Bruce Sewell - NO WAY...

No Wonder Bruce Sewell left Intel without much to say. Not only was he offered more money and other secret sides deals to MOVE Quickly as Nokia is a Coming... but also D. Bruce Sewell had to know that at Some Point Intel and it's Shareholders would have to Deal with the iviewit Company and with the Trillion Dollar Stolen Patent and with the Patent Infringement and Contracts ... this woudl at Somepoing Come up, Bruce Sewell Being a Super Duper Attorney - He had to Know this. Obviously these Contracts would have to be honored at some point and with damges... being a good Lawyer, Bruce Sewell certainly read all the Documents at www.iviewit.TV - read the lawsuits, patent claims and ALL court documents surrounding this case in Order to Protect the Intel Corporation and to Protect the Interest of The Shareholders. I mean Come on this is a HUGE Liability to Intel and Bruce Never did any of this.. he Had to Have ... Right?

Having had Fair Warning on all this, and Failing ... is D. Bruce Sewell liable to Intel ? Liable to the Shareholders for this Seemingly Undisclosed Damage he Did while at Intel that has been swept under the Rug as D. Bruce Sewell is Now general counsel at Apple and His gearing up to ATTACK the Rights of Nokia... wonder what judges, what connections, what favors owed or inside informatio nBruce Sewell will use to Win for Apple.

Maybe D. Bruce Sewell will tell the companies involved that he won't tell about their Iviewit Patent Infringement if they help Apple to Fight Nokia and Win.. just speculative of course.. but hey don't we have a "Corporate Social Responsibility" to examine all parts of this story? And to Expose the Truth about all this...

Email me Your Story about Bruce Sewell at Crystal@CrystalCox.com - I am Nobody, I am simply a researcher, who Does not like to see the Rights of People STOMPED on by Billion Dollar Companies Stealing Trillion Dollar technology while the Real Inventors are Bombed and subjected to severe economic terror. I am simply the Self Proclaimed Industry Whistleblower and Standing up for Those who are not being heard, and using the Power of the Internet to Get them Heard....

My Expose' of Bruce Sewell.. I am not claiming to be
Tech Writer, I am Simply One Gal.. telling You What I see...
Crystal Cox

Friday, January 1, 2010

Bruce Sewell the Pompass ASS, Says - "“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,”



From the Apple Press Room - Online Of Course.. We have the Double Standards, Flat out Lies and Serious Double Talk from One D. Bruce Sewell General Council to Apple.

I mean this Cannot Really Be CAN IT..?.. Shocking Statement by Now Infamous Double Talker and Patent Infringement Companies BEST BUDDY - Bruce Sewell ...

DurWOOD.. oh I mean DurWard - Bruce Sewell Says THIS...

"“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell, Apple’s General Counsel and senior vice president. " "

OH Yes, there it in Lights. Never Forget this Now Famous Statement that Will End Bruce Sewell's Career as He Once Knew It. Bruce Sewill - the POT Calling the KETTLE Black - per say... as he Smacks down the REAL inventors NOW at his NEW Job at Apple just like he DID at Intel Corp... Now at Intel - CEO Paul Otellini KNEW - we Wonder WHO at APPLE knows the TRUTH about Bruce Sewell and if that is WHY he Was Hired as General Council...

Bruce Sewell knowing Full Well of the Trillion Dollar Patent Theft of the REAL Inventors of the Iviewit Technology - Having FULL knowledge that "other companies" the ONE he was Representing was USING this Stolen Patent and NOT honoring Contract Commitments with the Iviewit Technology Company, and having been Fully Informed of the Importance this Matter was to the Financial Future of the Intel Company and to their Shareholders.... Bruce Sewell withheld this information and Denied the Real Inventors THEIR RIGHTS.

D. Bruce Sewell did this Blatantly, he knew he was above the Law and would never be held accountable for this. For NO ONE would EVER know RIGHT?

Boy if I Was APPLE ... I would Want to Hire the Almighty Bruce Sewell as Well this Way, all those Smart Boys and Girls out there inventing that Really Neat Stuff will have no rights and Get nothing and when they squirm and Fight about it we will just sick Ol' Bruce on Em' - Cuz... Bruce Sewell has Connections in VERY high places, and Bruce Sewell Knows the Ropes when it Comes to SHUTTING up those Pesky inventors, those Patent Owners...

So Again This Statement...

"“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell, Apple’s General Counsel and senior vice president. "

and Oh Believe Me this Will SOON be the Most Highlighted Statement of D. Bruce Sewell's Career... Anyway...

Iviewit Did Invent "their own Technolgy" - D. Bruce Sewell then of Intel as their "General Counsel" Well he was informed of this.

Bruce Sewell knew that the Technology Was STOLEN - and he stood by the Criminals and NOT with the Victims as he Denied the REAL inventors their rights.

And now when the Shoe is on the Other Foot, the Self Righteous Pompass Ass Bruce Sewell says that " "“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell " -

How in the Heck do you COMPETE with a General Counsel from a MAJOR Tech Company when He is Above the Law, knows the Names and Players, has inside information and Stands Seriously on the WRONG side of the MORAL Compass?

You can't win against Liars like Bruce Sewell. He Condones the Stealing of Patents when at Intel and Now is suggesting that Nokai is Falsley Accusing Apple and that Nokai is "stealing ours" - sounds like a School Yard Bully .... but This School Yard Bully Packs a Trillion Dollar Punch and YOU LOSE!!

Here is the Now Infamous APPLE Press Release...


" Apple Countersues Nokia

CUPERTINO, California—December 11, 2009—Responding to a lawsuit brought against the company by Nokia, Apple® today filed a countersuit claiming that Nokia is infringing 13 Apple patents.

“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell, Apple’s General Counsel and senior vice president.

Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its award-winning computers, OS X operating system and iLife and professional applications.

Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and has entered the mobile phone market with its revolutionary iPhone.

Press Contacts:
Steve Dowling
Apple
dowling@apple.com
(408) 974-1896

NOTE TO EDITORS:
For additional

Source:
Apples Own Press Room...
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/12/11countersue.html
Copy This, Print It Out... Frame It...

Words Durward... YEP thats his Name..
D. Bruce Sewell ..
Words He WILL never Forget Saying.
Bruce Sewell
Industry Whistle Blower Crystal L. Cox asks -

Do you have any Information on Bruce Sewell,
why he Left Intel Corp ?

Why he Denied Iviewit their Rights? or any other Whistleblowing on D. Bruce Sewell - aKa - Durward Bruce Sewell - Email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com